Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Ivan Ramos-MartínezDepartamento de Medicina y Zootecnia de Cerdos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3575-8722
Edgar Ramos-MartínezEscuela de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, Oaxaca 68110, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3985-3628
Manuel Saavedra-MontañezDepartamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1168-5271
Saraí Santos-PaniaguaUnidad de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
René Segura-VelázquezUnidad de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-4919
Onasis Vicente-FermínEscuela de Enfermería, Instituto Nacional de cardiología "Ignacio Chávez", Ciudad de México 14080, Mexico.
Mayte Martínez-AguirreInstituto de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Juan C Ramos-MartínezDepartamento de Cardiología, Hospital General Regional "Lic Ignacio Garcia Tellez" IMSS, Mérida 97150, Mexico.
Sheila Irais Peña-CoronaDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Rodolfo Pastelin-PalaciosDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
José Ivan Sánchez-BetancourtDepartamento de Medicina y Zootecnia de Cerdos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-9669
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Influenza A is a zoonotic disease that affects dogs, pigs, horses, poultry, and birds. In this report, a meta-analysis according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was conducted. Studies of influenza A viruses in dogs providing prevalence or seroprevalence in any location worldwide were included. The results in this study show that the seroprevalence for the H3N8 influenza subtype was 7.96% (95% CI: 2.03-16.8,
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Meta-Analysis of Seroprevalence and Prevalence of Influenza A Viruses (Subtypes H3N2, H3N8, and H1N1) in Dogs. · full record | OpenQuestion