ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Contamination Survey of Insect Genomic and Transcriptomic Data.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid advancement of high-throughput sequencing has led to a great increase in sequencing data, resulting in a significant accumulation of contamination, for example, sequences from non-target species may be present in the target species' sequencing data. Insecta, the most diverse group within Arthropoda, still lacks a comprehensive evaluation of contamination prevalence in public databases and an analysis of potential contamination causes. In this study, COI barcodes were used to investigate contamination from insects and mammals in GenBank's genomic and transcriptomic data across four insect orders. Among the 2796 WGS and 1382 TSA assemblies analyzed, contamination was detected in 32 (1.14%) WGS and 152 (11.0%) TSA assemblies. Key findings from this study include the following: (1) TSA data exhibited more severe contamination than WGS data; (2) contamination levels varied significantly among the four orders, with Hemiptera showing 9.22%, Coleoptera 3.48%, Hymenoptera 7.66%, and Diptera 1.89% contamination rates; (3) possible causes of contamination, such as food, parasitism, sample collection, and cross-contamination, were analyzed. Overall, this study proposes a workflow for checking the existence of contamination in WGS and TSA data and some suggestions to mitigate it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.