Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682326›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Using Social Network Analysis to Assess 'Groupness' in a Mixed-Species Zoo Exhibit of Tufted Capuchins (

Sophia Daoudi-Simison, Phyllis Lee, Hannah M Buchanan-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophia Daoudi-SimisonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4DR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-9244
Phyllis LeePsychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4296-3513
Hannah M Buchanan-SmithPsychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-7734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed-species groups have been recorded in various primates, including tufted capuchin and squirrel monkeys. Measures of their 'groupness' are typically based on factors such as group stability, social interactions, proximity, or behavioural coordination. Social network analysis has become a useful tool for quantifying relationships among group-living individuals. Here, we apply social network analysis to two captive mixed-species groups of tufted capuchins and squirrel monkeys housed at the Living Links to Human Evolution Research Centre, Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh Zoo, UK. We conducted 183 h of focal observations (three hours per individual, excluding co-observations) and calculated association rates using a simple index ratio. Permutation

Indexed as

capuchinsmixed-species groupsprimatessocial network analysissquirrel monkeys

Identifiers

PMID39682326
PMCPMC11640433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.