ReviewCancers2024
Estimating the Benefits of Oral Cancer Screening: Challenges and Opportunities.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Organized Strategies to Enhance Access to Preventive Oral Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals in Brazil: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Care.International journal of cancer · 2026Trial
- Public awareness of oral cancer in Palestine: a web-based cross-sectional survey.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Assisted Analysis of the Oral Cancer Immune Microenvironment: From Single-Cell Level to Prognostic Model Construction.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Beyond Genetics: Exploring Lifestyle, Microbiome, and Social Determinants in Oral Cancer Development.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Role of Healthcare Providers in Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer Screening.Fortune journal of health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Screening is widely believed to facilitate early detection and improve health outcomes; however, recent evidence questions its overall benefits, highlighting the need for a critical assessment of cancer screening programs. The simplicity of clinical oral examination and the easy accessibility of the oral cavity make oral cancer a suitable candidate for opportunistic screening. Despite this uniqueness, studies that solidly assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of oral cancer screening are scanty, and the only large randomized trial undertaken so far shows limited evidence of mortality reduction through population screening. Research indicates that while early detection rates following screening may increase, they do not necessarily translate into decreased oral cancer deaths. This article emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of the benefits of screening, awareness of deceptive metrics and inherent biases in the context of early detection, and the importance of improving dentist education and introducing new technologies to enhance clinical decision-making. The review calls for a balanced and evidence-based approach to oral cancer screening, integrating it with broader oral health initiatives to maximize public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.