Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682292›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Bayesan Model to Predict R Status After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer.

Isabella Frigerio, Quoc Riccardo Bao, Elisa Bannone, Alessandro Giardino, Gaya Spolverato, Giulia Lorenzoni, Filippo Scopelliti, Roberto Girelli, Guido Martignoni, Paolo Regi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Isabella FrigerioHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Quoc Riccardo BaoGeneral Surgery 3, Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3463-6659
Elisa BannoneHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Alessandro GiardinoHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7980-5781
Gaya SpolveratoGeneral Surgery 3, Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7275-2573
Giulia LorenzoniUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Filippo ScopellitiHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5539-6653
Roberto GirelliHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Guido MartignoniDepartment of Pathology, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Paolo RegiHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Danila AzzolinaUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-5742
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7906-0580
Giovanni ButturiniHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, 37109 Peschiera del Garda, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9172-4885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo build a Bayesian approach-based model to predict the success of surgical exploration post-neoadjuvant treatment.

backgroundPancreatic cancer (PDAC) is best treated with radical surgery and chemotherapy, offering the greatest chance of survival. Surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is indicated in the absence of progression, knowing the limits in accurately predicting resectability with traditional radiology. R Status being a pathological parameter, it can be assessed only after surgery.

methodPatients successfully resected for histologically confirmed PDAC after NAT for BR and LA disease were included, with attention to the predictors of R status from the existing literature. The Bayesian logistic regression model was estimated for predicting the R1 status. The area under curve (AUC) of the average posterior probability of R1 was calculated and results were reported considering the 95% posterior credible intervals for the odds ratios, along with the probability of direction.

resultsThe final model demonstrated a commendable AUC value of 0.72, indicating good performance. The likelihood of positive margins was associated with older age, higher ASA score, the presence of venous and/or arterial involvement at preoperative radiology, tumor location within the pancreatic body, a lack of tumor size reduction post-NAT, and the persistence of an elevated Ca19.9 value.

conclusionsA Bayesian approach using only preoperative items is firstly used with good performance to predict R Status in pancreatic cancer patients who underwent resection after neoadjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Bayesan modelneoadjuvant therapypancreatic cancerpredictive modelR Status

Identifiers

PMID39682292
PMCPMC11640340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.