Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682264›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Gut Microbiome Changes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Kristina Žukauskaitė, Bernardas Baušys, Angela Horvath, Rasa Sabaliauskaitė, Agnė Šeštokaitė, Agata Mlynska, Sonata Jarmalaitė, Vanessa Stadlbauer, Rimantas Baušys, Augustinas Baušys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kristina ŽukauskaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Science Center, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Bernardas BaušysInstitute of Biosciences, Life Science Center, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6542-4045
Angela HorvathDivision for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7279-0628
Rasa SabaliauskaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Science Center, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-3465-3558
Agnė ŠeštokaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Science Center, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Agata MlynskaLaboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Sonata JarmalaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Science Center, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-3719-0891
Vanessa StadlbauerDivision for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5508-8271
Rimantas BaušysDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Augustinas BaušysInstitute of Biosciences, Life Science Center, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba S-MIP-22-30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical gastrectomy is the current standard approach for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) in the West. Both NAC and gastrectomy can significantly influence the gut microbiome, potentially leading to clinically significant changes. However, no longitudinal studies to date support this hypothesis. This study investigates gut microbiome changes throughout GC treatment, including NAC and gastrectomy.

methodsThis longitudinal observational study included GC patients undergoing NAC followed by gastrectomy. Fecal microbiome composition, intestinal inflammation (fecal calprotectin), and gut permeability (LBP, sCD14) markers were investigated at baseline, after NAC, and after gastrectomy.

resultsA total of 38 patients were included in the study. The results showed that NAC did not affect the gut microbiome composition at the phylum level. In contrast, radical gastrectomy led to an increased abundance of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria and a decreased abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Furthermore, NAC alone did not impact alpha or beta diversity, while a combination of NAC and gastrectomy significantly influenced both. After gastrectomy, the gut microbiome composition analysis also revealed enrichment of oralization-associated bacterial species such as

conclusionsThe radical treatment of advanced GC with NAC and radical surgery has long-term effects on the gut microbiome, characterized by gut microbiome oralization. These sustained alterations primarily stem from the radical gastrectomy rather than the NAC. Since previous studies have linked oralization-associated dysbiosis to various gastrointestinal symptoms, this study highlights the gut microbiome as a potential therapeutic target to enhance the quality of life in long-term survivors following gastrectomy.

Indexed as

dysbiosisFLOTgastrectomygastric cancergut microbiomeneoadjuvant chemotherapyoralizationradical surgery

Identifiers

PMID39682264
PMCPMC11640656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.