ReviewCancers2024
Long-Term Effects on Gonadal Function After Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cancer and fertility management: FIGO best practice advice.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Guideline
- Impact of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for benign and malignant haematologic and non-haematologic disorders on fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Development of medical freezing measures in women during the last decade from 2014 to 2023: registry data of the tri-national network FertiPROTEKT.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Decreasing barriers to the utilization of cryopreserved sperm in male cancer survivors: an expert review and guide.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Fertility Sparing Medical Management Options in Gynecologic Cancers.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the population under 50 years of age, with more than 10% of cases occurring in young adults. Fertility preservation counseling has therefore received increased attention in this younger patient population. The treatment of CRC is often based on multimodal therapies, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and, more recently, immunotherapy, which makes it difficult to estimate the expected effect of treatment on fertility. We, therefore, systematically analyzed the published literature on the gonadotoxic effects of CRC treatments to better advise patients on the risk of infertility and the need for fertility preservation measures. This systematic review and meta-analysis are part of the FertiTOX project, which aims to reduce the data gap regarding the gonadotoxicity of oncological therapies.
objectivesThe aim of this review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential impact of CRC therapies on gonadal function to allow more accurate counseling regarding the risk of clinically relevant gonadotoxicity and the need for fertility preservation measures before oncological treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and CENTRAL in March 2024. A total of 22 out of 4420 studies were included in the review. Outcomes were defined as clinically relevant gonadotoxicity, indicated by elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and/or undetectable anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and/or the need for hormone replacement therapy in women and azoo-/oligozoospermia and/or low inhibin B levels in men. Studies with fewer than nine patients were excluded from the meta-analysis.
resultsThe qualitative analysis included 22 studies with 1634 subjects (775 women, 859 men). Treatment consisted of active surveillance after surgery (37.7%), chemotherapy (12.7%), radiation (0.2%), or radiochemotherapy (53.9%). In 0.5%, the therapy was not clearly described. The meta-analysis included ten studies and showed an overall prevalence of clinically relevant gonadotoxicity of 23% (95% CI: 13-37%). In women, the prevalence was 27% (95% CI: 11-54%), and in men, 18% (95% CI: 13-26%). A subanalysis by type of CRC was only possible for rectal cancer, with a prevalence of relevant gonadotoxicity of 39% (95% CI: 20-64%). In patients undergoing chemotherapy exclusively, the prevalence was 4% (95% CI: 2-10%). In those receiving only radiotherapy, the prevalence was 23% (95% CI: 10-44%); in contrast, it reached 68% (95% CI: 40-87%) in patients who received radiochemotherapy.
conclusionsThis first meta-analysis of the clinically relevant gonadotoxicity of CRC therapies provides a basis for counseling on the risk of infertility and the need for fertility preservation measures. Despite the low prevalence of gonadotoxicity in cases receiving chemotherapy alone, fertility preservation is still recommended due to the uncertainty of subsequent therapy and the lack of large longitudinal data on individual treatment effects. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the impact of CRC treatment on gonadal function and estimate the effect of new treatment modalities, such as immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.