ArticleCancers2024
Hepatitis and Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Everolimus-Treated Solid Tumor Patients: A Focus on HBV-Endemic Areas.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and the risk of extrahepatic malignancies: an updated review of epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical implications.Virology journal · 2026Review
- Antiseizure Treatments and Liver Injury: Expect (and Prevent) the Unexpected.Epilepsy currents · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEverolimus is approved for treating breast, renal, and pancreatic neuroendocrine cancers but carries the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) and hepatitis. However, data on HBVr in everolimus-treated patients are limited. This study evaluates the risk of hepatitis and HBVr in cancer patients with current or past HBV infection.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients prescribed everolimus between 1 January 2011 and 31 May 2022, using a private healthcare system database in Taiwan. Patients with HBsAg positivity or HBsAg negativity and anti-HBs or anti-HBc results were included. The cumulative incidence function and risk of hepatitis from a competing risk model, which estimates Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard (SDH), were analyzed across different HBV serological subgroups. The risk of hepatitis B reactivation was also calculated.
resultsOf 377 patients, 45% (36/80) of HBsAg-positive and 0.67% (2/297) of HBsAg-negative patients received nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) prophylaxis. Hepatitis occurred in 28.75% of HBsAg-positive and 17.85% of HBsAg-negative patients. Baseline HBsAg positivity and exemestane use increased hepatitis risk. HBVr occurred in 11.36% (5/44) of HBsAg-positive patients without NUCs and 5.56% (2/36) with prophylaxis. Two HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive patients developed severe HBVr-related hepatitis.
conclusionHepatitis occurred in 28.75% of HBsAg-positive and 17.85% of HBsAg-negative patients on everolimus. HBVr was common in HBsAg-positive patients but rare in HBsAg-negative individuals. HBV screening and liver function monitoring are critical for patients with past or current HBV infection receiving everolimus, especially in endemic areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.