ArticleCancers2024
Arterial Infusion and Isolated Perfusion in Combination with Reversible Electroporation for Locally Relapsed Unresectable Breast Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRelapsed unresectable triple-negative breast cancer is a demanding disease with only a few treatment options. Especially for patients with unresectable tumor masses, a treatment that offers rapid tumor shrinkage is needed. If patients are exhausted from several treatment lines, systemic side effects have to be avoided. Reversible electroporation has shown to be effective for breast cancer if combined with systemic bleomycin and/or cisplatin. To enhance the local effect and reduce the systemic side effects, we combined reversible electroporation with regional chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with advanced metastasized and relapsed breast cancer received regional chemotherapy via intra-arterial infusion and isolated thoracic perfusion combined with percutanous reversible electroporation. Circulating tumor cells (CETCs/CTCs) were counted before and 24 h after the treatment. Tumor response was evaluated by CT (computer tomography) control.
resultsA total of 21 treatments were conducted for 14 patients who had a mean tumor size of 7.6 cm (standard deviation 3.3 cm). Higher local drug levels are present with arterial infusion compared to venous infusion and result in enhanced response rates. Circulating tumor cells decreased or stayed stable for 24 h after the treatment for 11 and 8 cases, respectively. An increase was observed in two cases. A total of 13 patients showed a clinical response with tumor shrinkage that led to resectability. One patient did not respond to the treatment regimen.
conclusionsThe combination of reversible electroporation with intra-arterial chemotherapy is feasible and results in a good clinical response with neglectable side effects. The treatment is repeatable and can lead to resectability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.