Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682171›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Enhancing Glioblastoma Resection with NIR Fluorescence Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Hadeel M Mansour, Siddharth Shah, Tania M Aguilar, Mohammed Abdul-Muqsith, Gabriel S Gonzales-Portillo, Ankit I Mehta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: addressing gaps, capturing patient experience, and advancing the field.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hadeel M MansourDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-5503-997X
Siddharth ShahDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-1501
Tania M AguilarDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Mohammed Abdul-MuqsithDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-4234-2929
Gabriel S Gonzales-PortilloDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Ankit I MehtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GB) is among the most aggressive and difficult-to-treat brain tumors, with a median survival of only 12-15 months despite maximal treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Extensive surgical resection improves survival in glioblastoma patients; however, achieving complete resection is often hindered by limitations in neurosurgical guidance technologies for accurate tumor margin detection. Recent advancements in fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) and imaging techniques have significantly enhanced the precision and extent of glioblastoma resections. This study evaluates the impact of NIR fluorescence imaging on tumor visualization, surgical precision, cost-effectiveness, and patient survival. A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Embase was conducted to identify studies on the role of NIR fluorescence in glioblastoma surgery. A total of 135 studies were included, comprising 10 reviews, three clinical studies, 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 10 preclinical studies, and four case reports, all focused on NIR fluorescence imaging in glioblastoma surgery. The findings indicate that NIR fluorescence imaging significantly improves tumor visualization, resulting in an 18-22% increase in gross total resection (GTR) rates in clinical studies. NIR fluorescence provides continuous real-time feedback, minimizing repeat imaging, reducing operational costs, and increasing GTR. These improvements contribute to better patient outcomes, including extended progression-free survival, improved overall survival, and reduced postoperative neurological deficits. This review underscores the potential of NIR imaging to establish a new standard for intraoperative glioblastoma management.

Indexed as

fluorescencefluorescence guided imagingGBMglioblastomanear-infraredneurosurgeryNIR

Identifiers

PMID39682171
PMCPMC11639985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.