ArticleCancers2024
In Silico Design of Peptide Inhibitors Targeting HER2 for Lung Cancer Therapy.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeted biologics for TNBC: Advances in nanobodies, antibodies, peptides, and aptamers.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed in several malignancies, such as breast, gastric, ovarian, and lung cancers, where it promotes aggressive tumor proliferation and unfavorable prognosis. Targeting HER2 has thus emerged as a crucial therapeutic strategy, particularly for HER2-positive malignancies. The present study focusses on the design and optimization of peptide inhibitors targeting HER2, utilizing machine learning to identify and enhance peptide candidates with elevated binding affinities. The aim is to provide novel therapeutic options for malignancies linked to HER2 overexpression.
methodsThis study started with the extraction and structural examination of the HER2 protein, succeeded by designing the peptide sequences derived from essential interaction residues. A machine learning technique (XGBRegressor model) was employed to predict binding affinities, identifying the top 20 peptide possibilities. The candidates underwent further screening via the FreeSASA methodology and binding free energy calculations, resulting in the selection of four primary candidates (pep-17, pep-7, pep-2, and pep-15). Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were utilized to evaluate molecular and reactivity characteristics, while molecular dynamics simulations were performed to investigate inhibitory mechanisms and selectivity effects. Advanced computational methods, such as QM/MM simulations, offered more understanding of peptide-protein interactions.
resultsAmong the four principal peptides, pep-7 exhibited the most elevated DFT values (-3386.93 kcal/mol) and the maximum dipole moment (10,761.58 Debye), whereas pep-17 had the lowest DFT value (-5788.49 kcal/mol) and the minimal dipole moment (2654.25 Debye). Molecular dynamics simulations indicated that pep-7 had a steady binding free energy of -12.88 kcal/mol and consistently bound inside the HER2 pocket during a 300 ns simulation. The QM/MM simulations showed that the overall total energy of the system, which combines both QM and MM contributions, remained around -79,000 ± 400 kcal/mol, suggesting that the entire protein-peptide complex was in a stable state, with pep-7 maintaining a strong, well-integrated binding.
conclusionsPep-7 emerged as the most promising therapeutic peptide, displaying strong binding stability, favorable binding free energy, and molecular stability in HER2-overexpressing cancer models. These findings suggest pep-7 as a viable therapeutic candidate for HER2-positive cancers, offering a potential novel treatment strategy against HER2-driven malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.