ArticleCancers2024
Pediatric Renal Cell Carcinoma (pRCC) Subpopulation Environmental Differentials in Survival Disadvantage of Black/African American Children in the United States: Large-Cohort Evidence.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare but severe and aggressive pediatric malignancy. While incidence is uncommon, survival is relatively low with respect to acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), AML, lymphoma, ependymoma, glioblastoma, and Wilms Tumor. The pediatric renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) incidence, cumulative incidence (period prevalence), and mortality vary by health disparities' indicators, namely sex, race, ethnicity, age at tumor diagnosis, and social determinants of health (SDHs) as well as Epigenomic Determinants of Health (EDHs). However, studies are unavailable on some pRCC risk determinants, such as area of residence and socio-economic status (SES). The current study aimed at assessing the temporal trends, cumulative incidence, household median income, urbanity, mortality, and pRCC survival differentials. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort design was utilized to examine the event-free survival of children (0-19) with RCC using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result Data, 1973-2015. While the time-dependent variable, namely survival months, was utilized, we assessed the predictors of pRCC survival, mainly sex, age at diagnosis, education, insurance status, income, and tumor grade, as prognostic factors. In examining the joint effect of area of residence and race, as an exposure function with time in survival, we utilized the Cox proportional hazard model, while the annual percent change was assessed using a generalized linear model, implying a weighted average.
resultsBetween 1973 and 2015, there were 174 cases of pRCC, of whom 49 experienced mortality (28.2%). The pRCC cumulative incidence tends to increase with advancing age. A significant survival differential was observed between black/AA children with RCC and their white counterparts. Compared with white children, black/AA children were almost three times as likely to die, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.56-5.31,
conclusionpRCC indicates an increased trend in males and age at diagnosis between 10 and 14, as well as a survival disadvantage among black/AA children, compared with their white counterparts. Additionally, urbanity significantly influences the racial differences in survival. These data are suggestive of the conjoined effect of environment and race in pRCC survival, indicative of further assessment of gene-environment interaction (epigenomics) in incidence, mortality, and survival in pRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.