ArticleCancers2024
Combined Cytokine Blockade Therapy (CCBT) Using Basiliximab and Infliximab for Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease (SR-GvHD).
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biochemical markers and emerging therapies for intestinal manifestation of graft-versus-host disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is systemic, high-dose glucocorticoids which have historically had limited responses. Combined cytokine blockade therapy (CCBT) with the monoclonal antibodies infliximab (a TNF-α inhibitor) and basiliximab (an IL-2 receptor blocker) has had limited discussion in the literature.
methodsSixty patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD were analyzed. The primary objective was to determine the overall response rate (ORR) for CCBT. Secondary outcomes included non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS).
resultsORR for CCBT at day 7, 14, and 28 were 28.3% (17/60; CR 5.0%/PR 23%), 38.3% (23/60; CR 11.3%/PR 27%), and 38.3% (23/60; CR 23.3%/PR 15%), respectively. Patients who received ruxolitinib prior to CCBT had lower ORR (25% CR = 15%/PR = 10%) compared to those who did not (47.5% CR = 27.5%/PR = 20%). In patients with and without ruxolitinib initiated prior to CCBT, NRM at 6 months was 60% (95% CI, 34.5-78) and 47.5% (95% CI, 31-62), while OS at 12 months was 30% (95% CI, 12-50) vs. 40% (95% CI, 25-55), respectively.
conclusionsCCBT has shown potential efficacy in steroid-refractory GI aGvHD, and given the observed ORR when used as second-line therapy, CCBT could serve as an acceptable alternative for patients who are ruxolitinib-intolerant. Ruxolitinib-refractory GI GvHD remains an area of unmet need and CCBT can provide salvage therapy for some patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.