Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682035›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Asymptotic Properties of Matthews Correlation Coefficient.

Yuki Itaya, Jun Tamura, Kenichi Hayashi, Kouji Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuki ItayaGraduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0006-0450-6908
Jun TamuraGraduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-7571-3265
Kenichi HayashiDepartment of Mathematics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3975-3005
Kouji YamamotoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K11790Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K11013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating classifications is crucial in statistics and machine learning, as it influences decision-making across various fields, such as patient prognosis and therapy in critical conditions. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), also known as the phi coefficient, is recognized as a performance metric with high reliability, offering a balanced measurement even in the presence of class imbalances. Despite its importance, there remains a notable lack of comprehensive research on the statistical inference of MCC. This deficiency often leads to studies merely validating and comparing MCC point estimates-a practice that, while common, overlooks the statistical significance and reliability of results. Addressing this research gap, our paper introduces and evaluates several methods to construct asymptotic confidence intervals for the single MCC and the differences between MCCs in paired designs. Through simulations across various scenarios, we evaluate the finite-sample behavior of these methods and compare their performances. Furthermore, through real data analysis, we illustrate the potential utility of our findings in comparing binary classifiers, highlighting the possible contributions of our research in this field.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, StatisticalConfidence IntervalsData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of Resultsclassificationconfidence intervalMatthews correlation coefficientMCCperformance metricstatistical inference

Identifiers

PMID39682035
PMCPMC11702320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.