Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39681995›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2025

MRI findings in six dogs with ependymoma of the brain and spinal cord.

John F Griffin, William S Stevenson, Nathan C Nelson, Annie V Chen, Silke Hecht, Brian F Porter, C Elizabeth Boudreau, Swan Specchi, Marco Bernardini, Wilfried Mai

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MRI findings in six dogs with ependymoma of the brain and spinal cord.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John F GriffinDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-7915
William S StevensonColumbia Veterinary Emergency Trauma and Specialty, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-6079
Nathan C NelsonDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3765-1694
Annie V ChenVeterinary Referral Center of Central Oregon, Bend, Oregon, USA.
Silke HechtDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8805-836X
Brian F PorterDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
C Elizabeth BoudreauDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Swan SpecchiDiagnostic Imaging Department, AniCura Ospedale Veterinario "I Portoni Rossi", Bologna, Italy.
Marco BernardiniDiagnostic Imaging Department, AniCura Ospedale Veterinario "I Portoni Rossi", Bologna, Italy.
Wilfried MaiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Section of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are few published descriptions of the MRI appearance of canine intracranial or spinal cord ependymoma. In this multicenter, retrospective, secondary analysis, case series study, three veterinary radiologists independently reviewed and recorded imaging characteristics of MRI studies in six dogs with histopathologically confirmed ependymoma (three intracranial and three spinal cord cases). A consensus was reached when there was disagreement on specific features. All intracranial ependymomas had forebrain location, heterogeneous signal intensity in T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) images, heterogeneous contrast enhancement, and hyperintensity in T2W images. Two ependymomas had an intraventricular location; one was intra-axial. Other imaging features included intralesional cyst-like structures, intralesional hemorrhage, and perilesional edema. Dogs with spinal cord ependymoma had intramedullary lesions located in the cervical or thoracic spinal cord. Spinal cord ependymomas were isointense and homogeneous in T1W images and hyperintense in T2W images. Lesion location relative to the central canal of the spinal cord was variable. All three spinal cord ependymomas had perilesional T2W hyperintensity and moderate, heterogeneous contrast enhancement. None of the spinal cord ependymomas had intralesional cyst-like structures. One spinal cord ependymoma had evidence of drop metastases (diffuse, leptomeningeal). MRI features of canine ependymomas overlap with those of other diseases of the brain and spinal cord. Ependymoma should be considered a differential diagnosis for dogs with intraventricular, intra-axial forebrain, or intramedullary spinal cord masses.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDog DiseasesEpendymomaSpinal Cord NeoplasmsAnimalsBrainDogsFemaleMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cordcentral nervous systemCNSmagnetic resonance imagingneoplasiatumor

Identifiers

PMID39681995
PMCPMC11649882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.