Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39681985›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2025

Gross target volume contouring in canine extra-axial brain tumors: Effects of magnetic resonance image slice thickness and time between subsequent image sets.

Valerie J Poirier, Tracy Gieger, Monica Jensen, Samuel Hocker, Christopher J Pinard, Fiona M K James, Stephanie Nykamp

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gross target volume contouring in canine extra-axial brain tumors: Effects of magnetic resonance image slice thickness and time between subsequent image sets.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valerie J PoirierDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-3934
Tracy GiegerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4889-4560
Monica JensenDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Samuel HockerDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher J PinardDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Fiona M K JamesDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie NykampDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate determination of the gross target volume (GTV) is critical in radiation treatment planning, as errors could result in underdosing of the tumor or overdosing of nearby organs at risk. This multicenter retrospective observational serial measurement study evaluated the effects of variations in MRI slice thickness and a time delay between the diagnostic (MRI-1) and RT planning (MRI-2) MRIs GTV contouring in dogs with presumed meningiomas. The hypothesis was that the GTV would increase in size with time on T1-weighted sequences with contrast. Inclusion required paired MRI acquisition within 3 months. The GTV was contoured on each MRI. Forty-six dogs were included. Slice thickness was significantly different (P < .001) between MRIs: MRI-1 had a median of 3.9 mm (range: 0.8-6 mm; only two dogs <2 mm), and MRI-2 had a median of 0.9 mm (range: 0.6-4.5 mm; only two dogs >2 mm). The median time between MRIs was 22 days (range: 8-74 days). The MRI-1 GTV was significantly different from MRI-2 GTV (P < .0001); thirty (65%) were larger, five were equal in size, and 12 were smaller than the MRI-2 GTV. This difference in GTV is likely due to the slice thickness differences between MRI acquisitions rather than changes in tumor size due to the short time interval between MRI-1 and MRI-2. This finding highlights the differences between diagnostic and RT treatment-planning MRIs. For brain tumor target contouring, an MRI at the same time as the RT planning CT with <1 mm slice thickness, 3D acquisitions, and anisotropic voxel is recommended.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDog DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleMeningiomaRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTumor Burdenmagnetic resonance imagingmeningiomaradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID39681985
PMCPMC11649881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.