Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39681957›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2025

Improving perinatal depression screening uptake: The impact of Medicaid reimbursement policy in Massachusetts.

Chanup Jeung, Laura B Attanasio, Kimberley H Geissler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chanup JeungDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Behavior, College of Integrated Health Sciences, State University of New York at Albany, Rensselaer, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-736X
Laura B AttanasioDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-0718
Kimberley H GeisslerDepartment of Healthcare Delivery and Population Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-1203

Funding

The Role of Insurance Networks and Organizational Factors in Guideline-Concordant Care for Serious Mental IllnessR34MH123628 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI GEISSLER, KIMBERLEY LYNN H · 2021 to 2023
$716k
National Institute for Health Care Management FoundationNIMH NIH HHS R34 MH123628NIMH NIH HHS R34MH123628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the Massachusetts Medicaid program's reimbursement policy change for perinatal depression screening on utilization rates. STUDY SETTING AND

designThis study employed a difference-in-differences design to compare insurance-paid prenatal and postpartum depression screening rates as well as postpartum antidepressant receipt rates between Medicaid and privately insured individuals before and after policy implementation in May 2016. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Data are from the 2014-2020 Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The study included individuals with a live birth from October 10, 2014, to December 31, 2019, who were continuously insured either by Medicaid or private insurance. PRINCIPAL

findingsAmong 141,085 births, 42.6% were covered by Medicaid. Among those with Medicaid, 1.9% had a paid postpartum depression screening prior to the policy and 16.9% after (1.5% vs. 12.3% for prenatal screening); among privately insured, 3.8% had a paid postpartum screening prior to the policy and 10.6% after (0.9% vs. 6.7% for prenatal screening). Antidepressant receipt rose from 6.9% to 8.3% among Medicaid enrollees and from 3.3% to 4.9% among privately insured individuals after the policy. After regression adjustment, implementation of the Massachusetts Medicaid reimbursement policy was positively associated with perinatal depression screening rates with a differential increase of 10.0 percentage points (p < 0.001) for postpartum screening and 3.5 percentage points (p < 0.001) for prenatal screening among Medicaid enrollees versus privately insured. Despite increased depression screening, the policy was not associated with a statistically significant change in antidepressant receipt among Medicaid enrollees compared to privately insured individuals.

conclusionsSeparate payment for perinatal depression screening significantly improved screening rates among Medicaid beneficiaries, highlighting Medicaid's critical role in identifying mental health needs for vulnerable populations. However, the persistence of sub-optimal screening rates among perinatal individuals underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to ensure universal screening and effective treatment for perinatal depression.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMass ScreeningMedicaidAdultAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansMassachusettsPregnancyUnited StatesYoung AdultAntidepressive Agentshealth promotion/prevention/screeningincentives in health carematernal and perinatal care and outcomesMedicaidmental health

Identifiers

PMID39681957
PMCPMC12047695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.