Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39681907›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2024

Unraveling the effects of the Ebola experience on behavior choices during COVID-19 in Liberia: a mixed-methods study across successive outbreaks.

Laura A Skrip, Malcom B Weller, Sheikh Dukuly, Neima Candy, Wahdae-Mai Harmon-Gray, Adolphus Clarke, Bernice T Dahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura A SkripSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Liberia, 1000-10, Monrovia, Liberia. skripla@ul.edu.lr.
Malcom B WellerSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Liberia, 1000-10, Monrovia, Liberia.
Sheikh DukulySchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Liberia, 1000-10, Monrovia, Liberia.
Neima CandySchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Liberia, 1000-10, Monrovia, Liberia.
Wahdae-Mai Harmon-GraySchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Liberia, 1000-10, Monrovia, Liberia.
Adolphus ClarkeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Liberia, 1000-10, Monrovia, Liberia.
Bernice T DahnCollege of Health Sciences, University of Liberia, Monrovia, Liberia.

Funding

Sabin Vaccine Institute,United States 050169-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of morbidity and mortality differentially affected populations. Between and within populations, behavior change was likewise heterogeneous. Factors influencing precautionary behavior adoption during COVID-19 have been associated with multidimensional aspects of risk perception; however, the influence of lived experiences during other recent outbreaks on behavior change during COVID-19 has been less studied.

methodsTo consider how the direct disease experience ("near misses") and behavior change during the 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak may have impacted behavior change during the early waves of the COVID-19 outbreak in West Africa, we analyzed data from a mixed-methods study that included a phone-based survey and in-depth interviews among vaccinated Liberian adults. Logistic regression via generalized estimating equations with quasi-likelihood information criterion (QIC)-based model selection was conducted to evaluate the influence of the interaction between and individual effects of the outbreak (EVD and COVID-19) and the "near-miss" experience on adoption of individual precautionary behaviors. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts explored reasons for differential behavior adoption between the two outbreaks.

resultsAt the population level, being a "near miss" was not associated with significantly different behavior during COVID-19 versus Ebola; however, overall, people had lower odds of adopting precautionary behaviors during COVID-19 relative to during Ebola. Participants who report near miss experiences during Ebola were significantly more likely to report having a household member test positive for COVID-19 (p<0.001). Qualitatively, participants often reflected on themes around more proximal and personal experiences with Ebola than with COVID-19; they also commented on how EVD led to better preparedness at the systems level and within communities for how to behave during an outbreak, despite such awareness not necessarily translating into action during COVID-19.

conclusionsThe results suggest that perceived proximity and intensity to disease threats in space and time affect behavioral decisions. For successive disease threats, comparisons of the present outbreak to past outbreaks compound those effects, regardless of whether individuals were directly impacted via a "near-miss" experience. Measures, such as risk communication and community engagement efforts, that gauge and reflect comparisons with previous outbreaks should be considered in response strategies to enhance the adoption of precautionary behavior.

Indexed as

Behavior during outbreaksEbola outbreakLiberiaPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social and economic consequencesVaccination behavior

Identifiers

PMID39681907
PMCPMC11622887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.