Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39681877›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2024

Mobility paradoxes: disruptors, benefits, and agency among mobile female sex workers living with HIV in the Dominican Republic and Tanzania.

Maria De Jesus, Zoé Hendrickson, Julia Rivara, Clare Barrington, Yeycy Donastorg, Martha Perez, Hoisex Gomez, Jessie Mbwambo, Samuel Likindikoki, Deanna Kerrigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria De JesusDepartment of Environment, Development, and Health, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC, USA. dejesus@american.edu.
Zoé HendricksonJohns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Julia RivaraDepartment of Environment, Development, and Health, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Clare BarringtonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yeycy DonastorgInstituto Dermatológico y Cirugía de La Piel, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Martha PerezInstituto Dermatológico y Cirugía de La Piel, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Hoisex GomezInstituto Dermatológico y Cirugía de La Piel, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Jessie MbwamboMuhimibili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Samuel LikindikokiMuhimibili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Deanna KerriganDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Stigma, Cohesion and HIV Outcomes Among Vulnerable Women Across Epidemic SettingsR01MH110158 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KERRIGAN, DEANNA L · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
US National Institute of Mental Health R01MH110158US National Institute of Mental Health R01MH110158-05S2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobility is a key social determinant of health for female sex workers (FSWs). While extant research has focused on the adverse effects of mobility for FSWs, there are very few studies that have examined the multiple ways in which mobility may impact the lives of these mobile women from their perspective. This qualitative study aims to fill this gap by exploring how mobility impacts the lives, livelihoods, and HIV care and treatment from the perspectives of women living with HIV in two epidemic settings, the Dominican Republic and Tanzania.

methodsWe conducted two rounds of in-depth interviews with 12 Dominican women and 12 Tanzanian women who were 18 years plus, had an HIV-positive diagnosis, and reported having exchanged sex for money in the last month. We utilized thematic analysis with a focus on intra- and intercomparisons to observe patterns within and across the two contexts.

resultsWe identified a salient pattern of three thematic "mobility paradoxes," which related to both disruptors and benefits of sex work mobility: (1) uncertainty versus autonomy: while sex work mobility often took place in contexts of vulnerability, which often led to women experiencing violence, it simultaneously benefitted women by allowing them to choose where they stayed and make plans on their terms; (2) financial insecurity versus profitability: although participants sometimes made less money than expected when they traveled for sex work, there was a powerful economic benefit for mobile women as it increased their likelihood of profitability; and (3) disorder and interruptions versus strategy and social support in HIV care and treatment: participants reported that they were sometimes inconsistent with their HIV appointments and medications when they traveled for sex work. On the other hand, mobility contributed to participants often becoming more strategic and creative in their HIV care and treatment and relying on one another for support.

conclusionsFindings indicate that sex work mobility is a nuanced, complex, and paradoxical phenomenon. Implications include the development of strengths-based and community empowerment mobile health initiatives tailored to mitigate disruptors of mobility while maximizing benefits for this population.

Indexed as

Dominican RepublicFemale sex workersHIVMobilitySex workSocial determinants of healthTanzania

Identifiers

PMID39681877
PMCPMC11622933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.