ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Needleless graft preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand semitendinosus autograft: a biomechanical in vitro study using a porcine model.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRuptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common injuries. Reconstruction using autologous grafts is recommended to prevent further damage and functional impairment. Grafts are usually prepared with stabilizing sutures. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a 4-strand semitendinosus autograft preparation technique is non-inferior to conventional preparation techniques with regard to maximum tensile strength threshold.
methodsFresh porcine flexor tendons were used as specimens in this study. Four different preparation techniques for quadruple-folded tendons were compared. Group 1 three suture FiberWire® (n = 20) and Group 2 one suture FiberWire® (n = 20) using Krakow stitches, Group 3 (n = 10) using SPEEDTRAP® and piercing the autograft and 4 (n = 9) using SPEEDTRAP® without piercing the autograft for preparation. Biomechanical tensile testing included 50 sinusoidal cycles of preloading between 50 and 150 N at 1 Hz and load-to-failure was measured at 20 mm/min.
resultsFailure at the maximum load occurred at the filament for all samples, whereas failure of the suture/tendon interface was not observed. Load-to-failure was significantly higher in Group 1 (711 ± 91 N) than in all other groups. When comparing groups 2-4 load-to-failure was significantly higher in Group 2 (347 ± 24 N) than in Group 3 (258 ± 25 N, p < 0.02) but not than in Group 4 (325 ± 26N).
conclusionIn all 4 Groups the load to failure was higher than the maximum tension force on the construct that will be applied by hand (182N). Therefore, the needleless preparation technique seems to be a valuable alternative to conventional techniques for the insertion of the graft into the joint during joint-near tibial fixation technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.