ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Patients with Darier disease have an increased risk of keratinocyte carcinoma: a Swedish registry-based nationwide cohort study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consensus Recommendations for Management of Darier Disease: A Practical Approach.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence and Sub-Ultraviolet Reflectance Dermatoscopy of Grover's Disease (Transient Acantholytic Dermatosis): A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDarier disease is a genodermatosis which manifests as hyperkeratotic papules and superficial erosions mainly in seborrheic skin areas. This retrospective registry-based cohort study aimed to estimate the association between Darier disease and skin cancer.
resultsPatients diagnosed with Darier disease were identified from the patient registry of Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden) in 2016-2020. The local cohort included 13 patients. Verification of Darier disease diagnosis in the National Patient Registry showed positive predictive value of more than 90%. National Patient Registry was searched for Darier disease in 2001-2020, Swedish Cancer Registry for cancers and Prescribed Drug Register for medications. The national cohort included 770 patients and tenfold matched control cohort. Patients with Darier disease had an increased relative risk of keratinocyte carcinoma (basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma combined) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.5, P = 0.036). The risk increase was significant for basal cell carcinoma (HR, 1.8, 95% CI, 1.1-2.9, P = 0.012), whereas there was a trend for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, (HR, 1.9, 95% CI, 0.9-4.1, P = 0.086) and cutaneous melanoma (HR, 2.4, 95% CI, 0.9-6.2, P = 0.083). Standardized incidence ratio for keratinocyte cancers was 2.9 (95% CI, 2.4-3.3. The results were consistent in two subgroup analyses adjusting for use of retinoid and/or immunosuppressive drugs.
conclusionPatients with Darier disease have an increased risk of skin cancer, particularly keratinocyte carcinoma. This risk was consistent even when known risk modifiers for keratinocyte carcinoma were excluded in sensitivity analyses. The results support previously proposed molecular links between Darier disease and skin cancer, but further investigations are needed. Additional studies are also required to develop clinical management recommendations for Darier disease. In the meantime, dermatologists should be aware of the cancer risk in these patients and remain vigilant, as detecting cancer can be challenging in hyperkeratotic and/or eroded skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.