ArticleBMC primary care2024
Primary care in rural areas: a qualitative study on medical students' images and experiences of working in rural areas in southern Germany.
Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRural areas are increasingly moving back into the focus of social research, especially in the context of health care. As the shortage of general practitioners (GP) in rural areas is a significant challenge in Germany, there are several programs to counteract underuse effectively, acutely, and sustainably. One of those programs is 'Beste Landpartie Allgemeinmedizin' (BeLA), which was developed to strengthen primary care in rural areas and to sustainably promote young doctors to work as general practitioners in rural regions through didactical and financial support. The program includes an accompanying qualitative study exploring the motivational structures of medical students from a sociological perspective. For this study, the nexus of working in rural areas from the perspective of medical students with different forms of rural experiences was of interest.
methodsQualitative interviews have been conducted at regular intervals on an ongoing basis since 2020 to investigate motivational retention effects during the program. The current 33 interviews were analysed using the sociological conceptual framework of spatial methods.
resultsThe images and experiences of working in rural areas condition medical education in various ways. In addition to general images of living and working in rural areas in a biographical dimension, the idea of working as a GP in rural areas includes images of specific medical competencies and is conditioned by different medical tasks. From such a perspective, the images and attributions of working in primary care in a rural region demonstrate particularities, challenges, and the potential attractiveness of working in rural regions. DISCUSSION: The images and experiences of rural areas condition medical education in various ways and shape the expectations and the decision-making of possibly working in rural areas. The particularities, opportunities, and challenges of working in rural areas, which relate to both professional aspects and social life, are a major factor in the attractiveness of a potential rural practice. Didactical and educational curricula need to adapt the various attributions of working in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.