ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Therapeutic Potential of Stromal Vascular Fraction in Enhancing Wound Healing: A Preclinical Study.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Cardiac Protection by Thymoquinone and Valproic Acid in Absence Epilepsy.Physiological research · 2026Article
- Enhancing retention and quality of tissue stromal vascular fraction graft with globo H ceramide.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdipose tissue provides an abundant source of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells for immediate administration. It can also give rise to many multipotent adipose-derived stromal cells. SVF is the population of cells obtained from mechanical or enzymatic digestion of lipoaspirate with no necessity for cell culture or expansion. Recently, the heterogeneous cell population found in the SVF gained wide-ranging translational significance in regenerative medicine.
methodsForty-eight male rats were randomly divided into two main groups, including the control and SVF groups. Each group was further divided into four groups as follows: 0th-, 3rd-, 7th-, and 10th-day groups. A skin excision of 1 × 1 cm covering the epidermis and dermis was performed on the back skin. Just after the wound was created, a subepidermal injection of SVF was applied. SVF was obtained from human adipose tissue using Lipocube SVFTM. On the 0th (1 h after the injections), 3rd, 7th, and 10th days, rats were killed, and skin excisions from the wound areas tissues were performed. Histopathological, biochemical, and western blotting analyses were performed on tissues.
resultsOur data showed that SVF obtained from a healthy woman improved wound healing in healthy rats. SVF has promoted wound healing mainly because of its antioxidant, antiapoptotic, and fibroblast/myofibroblast stimulating effects. SVF stimulated collagen production and contraction of the wound lips, supporting the closure.
conclusionsOur study provides additional data about the efficacy and pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms of the action of SVF on wound healing in healthy subjects. Our study is an experimental animal study. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39681692What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.