ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Anterior segment OCT for imaging PAUL
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for tube exposure following Baerveldt glaucoma implantation and overlying tissue thickness assessed by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Sonography versus anterior segment OCT for imaging bleb morphology after glaucoma drainage device surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Extrusion-Free Survival Following Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery Using EverPatch PlusJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Best Practices for High-Quality Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Eyes with the Port Delivery Platform Implant.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparing the use of Tutopatch® pericardium with Tutoplast® fascia lata in the context of PAUL® glaucoma implant surgery: an anterior segment OCT study.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- In reply to the letter to the editor regarding "Biological ultrathin amniotic membrane flap to close refractory macular holes associated with high myopia".Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate a useful, non-contact method for the follow-up of pericardium patch graft changes in patients undergoing PAUL
methodsProspective analysis over six months of tube pericardium patch graft thickness of PGI surgical cases at the University Eye Hospital Bonn, Germany, from November 2021 to August 2022. In all eyes, Tutopatch
resultsTwenty-six eyes of 26 patients were included. Thickness of the patch material was 1188 µm (IQR 415 µm) directly after implantation and decreased over time to 1068 µm (IQR 478 µm) at 3 months and 846 µm (IQR 677 µm) at 6 months. No significant differences between groups were shown concerning gender (p = 0.128), ethnicity (p = 1.000), age (p = 0.741), glaucoma type (p = 0.173), other concurrent diseases (p = 0.302), former glaucoma surgeries (p = 1.000) and the quadrant of implantation (p = 0.555). Five eyes developed implant exposure. When comparing eyes with and without tube exposure, no significant differences were shown in average patch thickness above the tube directly after implantation (p = 0.476). However, significant differences in average thickness were observed at 3 months (p = 0.013) and 6 months (p = 0.005).
conclusionsPericardial patch grafts tend to thin over time which can be assessed by AS-OCT, the latter proving to be a useful method to follow-up patients who undergo patch graft implantation during PGI surgery. This investigation could potentially help identify patients at risk of tube exposure which in turn could lead to modification of patient management. It could also possibly be used in future studies to find more suitable patch materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.