ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Advancing laparoscopic skills training in Namibia: Implementation of the Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP) of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of educational practices in caesarean section training.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Optimizing the management of laparoscopic equipment in low-resource settings: a SAGES White Paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comparison of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement outcomes: image-guided percutaneous technique versus advanced laparoscopic surgical technique.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Advancing laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): pilot implementation of the Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP) with Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification in Ethiopia.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), laparoscopic surgery is challenging to implement due to limited resources and lack of expert surgeons as teachers. The Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP) was developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) to deliver sustainable and effective methods for teaching safe laparoscopic surgery. GLAP aims to train surgical leaders and trainees with the goal of eventual in-country replication of GLAP programming. After successful implementation in Mexico and Costa Rica, this study evaluates the feasibility of a pilot training course in Namibia, Southern Africa.
methodsIn December 2022 and September 2023, GLAP partnered with the Namibian Surgical Society and the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) to administer 2 GLAP courses, with hands-on simulation practice and lectures on surgical education, training, and curriculum development. Participants completed surveys assessing their surgical background and experiences, their experience with simulation, and interest in curriculum development at their home institutions. Participants were also evaluated on their time to completion for the five FLS tasks during the initial and final days of the program.
resultsOver two GLAP courses, there were a total of 31 practicing general, gynecologic, and urologic surgeons from Namibia, Ethiopia, Malawi, Somali, and Zambia, taught by 5-7 GLAP faculty members. Overall, 35.5% had formal laparoscopic training during residency or fellowship, 16.13% had no experience with laparoscopy, and 77.42% learned laparoscopy through observation. Fifty-three percent of respondents had never practiced laparoscopy on a simulator before and 45% of respondents noted they did not have mentors to help them learn laparoscopic skills. Eighty percent of participants noted lack of equipment as the most important factor limiting the use of laparoscopy, followed by 76% noting lack of trained surgeons and 73% noting lack of formal training. The majority of respondents noted a very strong desire for formal training (61%), including additional short-term courses in laparoscopy (58%) and FLS skills testing opportunities (63%) in the future. For skills acquisition, there was a statistically significant reduction in the time to complete the circle cut task at the end of the course (359.2 s vs 206 s, p-value 0.016) across both years.
conclusionsThere is limited adoption of laparoscopy in Namibia, hindered by lack of training, expert trainers, and equipment. Implementation of GLAP is feasible and offers an additional training opportunity to the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39681675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.