ArticleScientific reports2024
Prevalence of cardiac implantable electronic device infections in Germany in 2015.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Application of a Helix-Fixation Leadless Pacemaker and a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in a Dialysis Patient: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Taurolidine-Based Antimicrobial Compound on Contaminated Surfaces Simulated in a Standardized 4-Field Test.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Retained Permanent Epicardial Pacemaker Leads and Lung Abscess: A Diagnostic and Surgical Challenge.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Addressing Complications in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Guideline to Prevention of CIED Infection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The placement of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) comes with a risk of adverse events (AE). AE comprise complications associated with the procedure and the device. CIED infection is a severe AE. Reported CIED infection rates are regionally differing and publications of contemporary large cohort data regarding CIED infections for Germany are lacking. This investigation provides rates of CIED infection related hospital admission and CIED infection related mortality in Germany. Data from Germany's largest healthcare insurance fund was screened for CIED procedures during the period: January to December 2015. These data included placement, revision with aim to up- or downgrade, generator substitution, early revision and partial or complete extraction using specific procedure codes for reimbursement. Among the total population of beneficiaries undergoing CIED procedures, International Classification of Diseases codes (ICD 10 GM), operational and procedural codes for partial or complete hardware removal were used to identify CIED infections and lead related endocarditis. To report the corresponding mortality rates, the hospital discharge status was documented. In 2015, from a population of more than 27 million beneficiaries, we identified the cohort of 60,296 patients (57.3% male) who underwent any invasive CIED procedure. Within three months from the index procedure, 1,595 patients developed a major CIED infection. 1,129 (1.87%) were related to the generator pocket and 466 (0.8%) were related to the transvenous proportions of the leads, mortality after those infections was 8.4% and 15.24%, respectively. In summary, our data reveals a higher prevalence of acute CIED infection than previously noted. The elevated number of additional procedures in cases of CIED infection implies a deficiency in infection awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.