Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39681637›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2025

Conventional chemotherapy: millions of cures, unresolved therapeutic index.

Anthony Letai, Hugues de The

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A self-supplying HMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony LetaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. anthony_letai@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1993-9013
Hugues de TheCollege de France, CIRB, INSERM, CNRS, Université PSL Paris, Paris, France. hugues.dethe@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1113-4472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, millions of patients with cancer have been cured by chemotherapy alone. By 'cure', we mean that patients with cancers that would be fatal if left untreated receive a time-limited course of chemotherapy and their cancer disappears, never to return. In an era when hundreds of thousands of cancer genomes have been sequenced, a remarkable fact persists: in most patients who have been cured, we still do not fully understand the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic index by which the tumour cells are killed, but normal cells are somehow spared. In contrast, in more recent years, patients with cancer have benefited from targeted therapies that usually do not cure but whose mechanisms of therapeutic index are, at least superficially, understood. In this Perspective, we will explore the various and sometimes contradictory models that have attempted to explain why chemotherapy can cure some patients with cancer, and what gaps in our understanding of the therapeutic index of chemotherapy remain to be filled. We will summarize principles which have benefited curative conventional chemotherapy regimens in the past, principles which might be deployed in constructing combinations that include modern targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasmsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.