ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of proton pump inhibitors on brain health based on cross-sectional findings from the Rhineland Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Proton pump inhibitors and risk of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of dementia in a population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Risk of Kidney Disease, Dementia, and Fractures: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Antibiotic Cocktail Exacerbates Esomeprazole-Induced Intestinal Dysmotility While Ameliorating Gastric Dyspepsia in Mice.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic correlates of cognitive performance in healthy children and adolescents.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reports linking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with cognition and dementia show conflicting results, with limited evidence on underlying biological mechanisms. However, existing studies did not investigate brain microstructure, which could provide valuable insights into early structural changes indicative of cognitive decline. Analyses were based on cross-sectional baseline data from the Rhineland Study (n = 7,465; mean age 55.3 ± 13.7 years, range 30-95 years, 56.5% women). Using multivariate linear regression, we investigated associations between PPI use and cognition and brain macro- and microstructural measures (fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) as measures of white matter integrity). Analyses were stratified by short-term (< 3 years) and long-term (≥ 3 years) PPI use, with additional age stratification (< 65 years; ≥65 years) for cognitive outcomes. PPI users, especially younger individuals, showed poorer global cognition and working memory. Notably, younger long-term users had worse total memory. PPI use was not associated with brain volume or FA, but both short-term and long-term users showed higher MD in cognitive-related brain regions. Our findings indicate that prolonged PPI use, particularly in younger long-term users, is associated with poorer cognitive performance. Moreover, PPI users showed higher MD, indicating potential white matter integrity disruptions. Further research is needed to ascertain causality and underlying mechanisms behind PPI-related cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.