GuidelineAnnals of laboratory medicine2025
Clinical Pharmacogenetic Testing and Application: 2024 Updated Guidelines by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.
Guideline in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CYP2C9-dependent variability in propofol pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects: A population-based pharmacogenetic study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Factors Facilitating Adoption of Pharmacogenetic Testing by Prescribers of Antidepressants in Four US Health Systems: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional PGx Implementation Science Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in HLA and Non-HLA Immune Profiling: Integrating Next-Generation Sequencing and Artificial Intelligence in Transplantation.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenomics of Antineoplastic Therapy in Children: Genetic Determinants of Toxicity and Efficacy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Distribution ofFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, pharmacogenetics has substantial potential for addressing inter-individual variability in drug responses. Although pharmacogenetics has been a research focus for many years, resulting in the establishment of several formal guidelines, its clinical implementation remains limited to several gene-drug combinations in most countries, including Korea. The main causes of delayed implementation are technical challenges in genotyping and knowledge gaps among healthcare providers; therefore, clinical laboratories play a critical role in the timely implementation of pharmacogenetics. This paper presents an update of the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Testing and Application guidelines issued by the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and aims to provide the necessary information for clinical laboratories planning to implement or expand their pharmacogenetic testing. Current knowledge regarding nomenclature, gene-drug relationships, genotyping technologies, testing strategies, methods for clinically relevant information delivery, QC, and reimbursements has been curated and described in this guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.