ArticleCerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Lack of Consensus among Stroke Experts on the Optimal Blood Pressure Target of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evidence from a National Survey.
Article in Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere remains a lack of consensus among physicians regarding the blood pressure (BP) management strategy for acute ischemic stroke patients; this study sought to determine current practice patterns and extension of consensus among stroke physicians after publications of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsAn online survey of stroke clinicians registered to the Oriental Conference of Interventional Neurovascology (OCIN) platform and Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombectomy Stroke Study (ENCHANTED2/MT) trail collaborators was conducted to investigate the BP management strategy after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The survey was sent out in March 2024, extracted within 1 month, and then analyzed comprehensively using descriptive statistics.
resultsA total of 351 available responses were collected and analyzed. These participants mostly come from tertiary-level hospitals (90.6%) in 31 provinces in China. During MT, the most popular a BP target was 140-160 mm Hg (36.5%, 128/351) and 120-140 mm Hg (26.8%, 94/351). For patients achieved successful reperfusion, those who achieved expanded treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) 3 were expected to maintain BP target of 120-140 mm Hg (56.7%, 199/351) or <120 mm Hg (27.1%, 95/351), while eTICI 2b were wished to 120-140 mm Hg (45.3%, 159/351) or 140-160 mm Hg (38.5%, 135/351). For patients who achieved unsuccessful reperfusion, the most selected BP target was 140-160 mm Hg (40.7%, 143/351). In brief, clinical doctors from China with different experiences have different views on the goals of BP management.
conclusionsThe survey highlights inter-institutional variability among stroke experts regarding the optimal BP target for acute ischemic stroke. While a majority of institutions have established standardized protocols for post-MT BP management, further prospective randomized trials are warranted to determine the optimal BP target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.