ArticleJMIR research protocols2024
Examining Share plus-A Continuous Glucose Monitoring Plus Data-Sharing Intervention in Older Adults and Their Care Partners: Protocol for a Randomized Control Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05937321 (NIDDK Share Plus), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
NIDDK Share Plus: Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Data Sharing in Older Adults With T1D and Their Care Partners
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extended use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes: Results from the first 26 weeks of the 2GO-CGM trial.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are increasingly turning to care partners (CPs) as resources to support their diabetes management. With the rise in diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), there is great potential for CGM data sharing to increase CP involvement in a way that improves persons with diabetes' glucose management and reduces distress.
objectiveThe specific aims of this paper are to (1) evaluate the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the Share plus intervention compared to the CGM Follow app plus diabetes self-management education and support; (2) evaluate the effect of the Share plus intervention on time-in-range (TIR; primary outcome) and diabetes distress (secondary outcome); and (3) explore differences between groups in person with diabetes and CP dyadic appraisal and coping, quality of life, diabetes self-care, and CP burden at 12 and 24 weeks and associations of dyadic variables on outcomes.
methodsThis is a protocol for a feasibility, pilot randomized controlled trial. Older adults with T1D and their CP (N=80 dyads) will be randomized 1:1 to the Share plus intervention or Follow app plus diabetes self-management education. The trial will include a 12-week active intervention to determine the change in primary (TIR) and secondary (diabetes distress) outcomes, followed by a 12-week, observation-only phase to examine maintenance effects. The evaluation is guided by the Dyadic Coping Model. Patient-level effectiveness outcomes (TIR, hemoglobin A
resultsRecruitment started in August 2023 and enrollment began in November 2023. To date, 24 participants have been enrolled in this study. We expect to conclude this study in March 2026 and expect to disseminate results in March 2026.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this will be the first pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate both feasibility and effectiveness outcomes for the web-based, platform-delivered Share plus intervention for older adults with T1D and their CP. This research has implications for CGM data sharing in other age groups with T1D and type 2 diabetes.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05937321; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05937321. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/60004.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.