ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Ensemble Methods for Accurate, Precise and Reproducible Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential targets and mechanisms of Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate exposure in inducing chronic kidney disease: a multimodal study integrating epidemiology, network toxicology, and Mendelian randomization.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Smoother Alchemical Transformations via Enveloping Distribution Sampling for Free-Energy Estimation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Ensemble molecular dynamics for predicting binding energies of DNA intercalators.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Calculating Enzyme Inhibition with Random Forests.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Rapid, accurate, and reproduciblemSphere · 2025Article
- Path-Based Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Estimation, from Protein-Ligand to RNA-Ligand Binding.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Synthetic Retinoids for the Modulation of Genomic and Nongenomic Processes in Neurodegenerative Diseases.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free energy calculations for protein-ligand complexes have become widespread in recent years owing to several conceptual, methodological and technological advances. Central among these is the use of ensemble methods which permits accurate, precise and reproducible predictions and is necessary for uncertainty quantification. Absolute binding free energies (ABFEs) are challenging to predict using alchemical methods and their routine application in drug discovery has remained out of reach until now. Here, we apply ensemble alchemical ABFE methods to a large data set comprising 219 ligand-protein complexes and obtain statistically robust results with high accuracy (<1 kcal/mol). We compare equilibrium and nonequilibrium methods for ABFE predictions at large scale and provide a systematic critical assessment of each method. The equilibrium method is more accurate, precise, faster, computationally more cost-effective and requires a much simpler protocol, making it preferable for large scale and blind applications. We find that the calculated free energy distributions are non-normal and discuss the consequences. We recommend a definitive protocol to perform ABFE calculations optimally. Using this protocol, it is possible to perform thousands of ABFE calculations within a few hours on modern exascale machines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.