ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Accelerated cell-type-specific regulatory evolution of the human brain.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core elements play distinct roles in promoter birth and transcriptional regulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Positive selection on brain cis-regulatory elements in the human lineage drives changes in gene expression and susceptibility to neuropsychiatric disorders.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Expanding canonical cortical cell type markers in the era of single-cell transcriptomics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Could Metabolism-Related Long Non-Coding RNAs Be More Conserved than Their Brain-Related Counterparts?Genes · 2026Review
- Signatures of selection in pleiotropic genes involved in insect neuronal and immune systems.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Lineage-specific regulatory evolution: insights from massively parallel reporter assays.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The molecular basis of human brain evolution is a key piece in understanding the evolution of human-specific cognitive and behavioral traits. Comparative studies have suggested that human brain evolution was accompanied by accelerated changes of gene expression (referred to as "regulatory evolution"), especially those leading to an increase of gene products involved in energy production and metabolism. However, the signals of accelerated regulatory evolution were not always consistent across studies. One confounding factor is the diversity of distinctive cell types in the human brain. Here, we leveraged single-cell human and nonhuman primate transcriptomic data to investigate regulatory evolution at cell-type resolution. We relied on six well-established major cell types: excitatory and inhibitory neurons, astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells. We found pervasive signatures of accelerated regulatory evolution in the human brains compared to the chimpanzee brains in the major six cell types, as well as across multiple neuronal subtypes. Moreover, regulatory evolution is highly cell type specific rather than shared between cell types and strongly associated with cellular-level epigenomic features. Evolutionarily differentially expressed genes (DEGs) exhibit greater cell-type specificity than other genes, suggesting their role in the functional specialization of individual cell types in the human brain. As we continue to unfold the cellular complexity of the brain, the actual scope of DEGs in the human brain appears to be much broader than previously estimated. Our study supports the acceleration of cell-type-specific functional programs as an important feature of human brain evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.