ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2024
Role of Counterion in the Adsorption of Ionic Amphiphiles at Fluid Interfaces.
Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tuning the Surface Activity and Micellization ofLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This communication represents the chemical alternative to the previous two papers dealing with the influence of positively charged alkali cations on the adsorption properties of the series of the standard surfactant system of alkali-perfluorocarbon octanoates. Now, this contribution describes the adsorption properties of the negatively charged cationic surfactant series of trimethyldodecyl-ammonium halides. In our latest contributions, we have put forward a new model of adsorption of ionic surfactants. It says that the surface excess of the adsorbed anionic surfactant is exclusively determined by the cross-sectional area of the positive counterion. This, however, has been demonstrated by applying relevant, positively charged (alkali) counterions only, i.e., by anionic surfactants. In this article, we extend the new model to negatively charged counterions (halides) applying the cationic standard surfactant series of the trimethyldodecylammonium-halides. A big difference between the hydration behavior of the positively charged alkali and the negatively charged counterions has become striking. Thus, for example, whereas the ratio between the naked ion radius of the cesium and of the lithium cation is almost 2-fold, it is practically equal for the chloride and the iodide anion. Surprisingly, however, the relevant adsorption data are practically identical. This means that the bigger, negatively charged halide counterions interact considerably more strongly with their residual ionic surfactant group than the positively charged alkali cations with theirs. Due to this, the size of the hydrated negative halide ions is considerably greater than that of the relevant positive alkali ions. These specialties can well be explained by the Stern model of charge distribution across a naked ion's surface. It shows that for the electrostatic interaction between counterion and ionic surfactant headgroup, the peculiarities of the polar solvent of water will play a crucial role, too. By these investigations our new model of adsorption of ionic amphiphiles is further extended and gives finally evidence that it is of general validity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.