ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Engaging grade school learners with an interactive medical imaging activity.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using simple phantoms for teaching diagnostic and radiation therapy principles in hands-on medical physics outreach.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Engaging grade school learners with an interactive medical imaging activity.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report describes a 45-min active learning lesson plan that engages 4th-5th and 6th-8th grade school students in spatial reasoning through a review of medical imaging. The lesson plan reviews different planar orientations and cross-sections of computed tomography (CT) images of familiar objects. The lesson is designed to introduce students to the idea that scientists are key contributors to healthcare, including in medical imaging technologies that facilitate the visualization of internal structures of patients without invasive procedures. The lesson demonstrates the three standard anatomical planes, axial, sagittal and coronal, by guiding students through CT image datasets of various objects. Students then are led in an interactive "dissection" of fruit to compare internal structures with medical images. The lesson plan aligns with key aspects of Next Generation Science Standards and aims to spark interest in the field of medical physics among a young student population through an introduction to imaging technologies. Worksheets and imaging datasets are included as supplementary materials to facilitate interested physicists adapting this work for educational purposes in their own communities, with minimal repeated effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.