Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680587›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Geographical mapping and temporal trends of Acinetobacter baumannii carbapenem resistance: A comprehensive meta-analysis.

Masoumeh Beig, Elnaz Parvizi, Tahereh Navidifar, Narjes Bostanghadiri, Maryam Mofid, Narges Golab, Mohammad Sholeh

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High-Resolution Genomic Surveillance of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Antimicrobial potential of compounds from the MMV pandemic response box and COVID box against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The intricacies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masoumeh BeigDepartment of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Elnaz ParviziDepartment of Microbiology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran.
Tahereh NavidifarShoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Basic Sciences, Shoushtar, Iran.
Narjes BostanghadiriDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam MofidSchool of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran.
Narges GolabDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3767-0596
Mohammad SholehDepartment of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1748-7225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is of critical concern in healthcare settings, leading to limited treatment options. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of CRAB by examining temporal, geographic, and bias-related variations.

methodsWe systematically searched prominent databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Quality assessment was performed using the JBI checklist. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the COVID-19 timeframes, years, countries, continents, and bias levels, antimicrobial susceptivity test method and guidelines.

resultsOur comprehensive meta-analysis, which included 795 studies across 80 countries from 1995 to 2023, revealed a surge in carbapenem resistance among A. baumannii, imipenem (76.1%), meropenem (73.5%), doripenem (73.0%), ertapenem (83.7%), and carbapenems (74.3%). Temporally, 2020-2023 witnessed significant peaks, particularly in carbapenems (81.0%) and meropenem (80.7%), as confirmed by meta-regression, indicating a steady upward trend.

conclusionThis meta-analysis revealed an alarmingly high resistance rate to CRAB as a global challenge, emphasizing the urgent need for tailored interventions. Transparency, standardized methodologies, and collaboration are crucial for the accurate assessment and maintenance of carbapenem efficacy.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsCarbapenemsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCOVID-19Drug Resistance, BacterialGeographic MappingHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID39680587
PMCPMC11649148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.