ArticlePloS one2024
Estimation of foveal avascular zone area from a B-scan OCT image using machine learning algorithms.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study is to estimate the area of the Foveal Avascular Zone (FAZ) from B-scan OCT images using machine learning algorithms.
methodsWe developed machine learning models to predict the FAZ area from OCT B-scan images of eyes without retinal vascular diseases. The study involved three models: Model 1 predicted the FAZ length from B-scan images; Model 2 estimated the FAZ area from the predicted length using 1, 3, or 5 horizontal measurements; and Model 3 converted the FAZ area from pixels to mm2. The models' performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and the Coefficient of Determination (R2). The FAZ area was subsequently estimated by sequentially applying Models 1→2→3 on a new dataset.
resultsModel 1 achieved a MAE of 2.86, MSE of 17.56, and R2 of 0.87. Model 2's performance improved with the number of horizontal measurements, with the best results obtained using 5 lines (MAE: 40.36, MSE: 3129.65, R2: 0.95). Model 3 achieved a MAE of 1.52e-3, MSE of 4.0e-6, and R2 of 1.0. The accuracy of FAZ area estimation increased with the number of B-scan images used, with the correlation coefficient rising from 0.475 (1 line) to 0.596 (5 lines). Bland-Altman analysis showed improved agreement between predicted and actual FAZ areas with increasing B-scan images, evidenced by decreasing biases and narrower limits of agreement.
conclusionsThis study successfully developed machine learning models capable of predicting FAZ area from OCT B-scan images. These findings demonstrate the potential for using OCT images to predict OCTA data, particularly in populations where OCTA imaging is challenging, such as children and the elderly. Future studies could explore the developmental mechanisms of the FAZ and macula, providing new insights into retinal health across different age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.