ArticlePloS one2024
The challenge of preventing extinctions: Lessons from managing threatened land snails on Norfolk Island.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Norfolk Island, situated between Australia, New Zealand and New Caledonia, has a rich, narrowly endemic land snail fauna, which has suffered considerably from habitat loss and introduced predators. Eleven species (Stylommatophora, Microcystidae) are currently listed by the IUCN and/or Australia's EPBC Act 1999 as Endangered, Critically Endangered or Extinct. Based on targeted surveys undertaken since 2020, we re-assess the threat status of these taxa. For three species assessed to be at imminent risk of extinction, we report on the implementation of in-situ and ex-situ conservation actions and assess their effectiveness after a three-year period. We document current distributions and abundances of these species and describe experimental conservation methods, such as increased predator control, the erection of predator-proof exclosures, and the establishment of an ex-situ breeding population. We found that the relative abundance of one subspecies, Advena campbellii campbellii, was strongly correlated with monthly rainfalls. Trials of predator-proof exclosures that retain adults but allow juveniles to disperse indicated that snails can be successfully secured from predation. Increased efforts in predator control led to the killing of more rodents and chickens; however, the impact on the snail population is unclear. The ex-situ breeding population had high birth rates initially followed by high adult mortality. Adjustments in husbandry conditions reduced stress levels leading to sustainable birth rates and increased survivorship with the result of rapid population growth. We determined that the ovoviviparous A. campbellii campbellii matures at the age of 3-4 months and has a lifespan of 10-12 months in captivity. We conclude that focused predation studies are needed to determine the impact of introduced predators. The use of exclosures requires further refinement especially regarding feeding schedules. In-situ breeding requires significant time for establishment but can be implemented successfully. We assess three endemic species as Extinct, four as Critically Endangered and two as Vulnerable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.