Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680406›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Insomnia Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shuai Zhang, Yanan Zhao, Zongshi Qin, Ying Han, Jiakai He, Bin Zhao, Lei Wang, Yuting Duan, Jin Huo, Tuoran Wang and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07593365 (Clinical Application of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined With Immunoregulatory T Cells in Alleviating Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07593365 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Application of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined With Immunoregulatory T Cells in Alleviating Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University People's HospitalRan2026 to 2029Enrolled216ConditionsAromatase Inhibitor Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms (AIMSS), Breast Cancer, Pain AlleviationArmstranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, sham stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Application of auriculotherapy in cancer-related fatigue symptom cluster: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Gut-brain axis in health and brain disease.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shuai ZhangInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanan ZhaoInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zongshi QinClinical Research Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ying HanAcupuncture and Moxibustion Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiakai HeDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bin ZhaoDepartment of Acupuncture, College of traditional Chinese medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei WangInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuting DuanThe Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jin HuoAcupuncture and Moxibustion Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tuoran WangAcupuncture and Moxibustion Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yu WangInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peijing RongInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceEvidence from randomized clinical trials of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for chronic insomnia disorder is lacking.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of taVNS for chronic insomnia compared with the sham taVNS. DESIGN, SETTING, and

participantsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 2021 to December 2022 at a single center in Beijing, China. Patients with chronic insomnia disorder with a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) of at least 8 were enrolled. Statistical analysis was performed from June to September 2023.

interventionsPatients were allocated to the active taVNS group or sham taVNS group with a 1:1 ratio. Both groups received the stimulation for 30 minutes each time, twice a day, 5 consecutive days a week, with an 8-week treatment and a 12-week follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the mean change from baseline through week 8 in PSQI scores. Minimal clinically important difference was 2.5 points. Secondary outcomes included mental health, sleepiness, and fatigue. Safety was also evaluated.

resultsA total of 72 participants were randomized to either active taVNS group (36 participants; mean [SD] age, 45.2 [14.5] years; 27 [75.0%] female) or the sham taVNS group (36 participants; mean [SD] age, 44.6 [13.9] years; 31 [86.1%] female); 68 participants completed the 8-week intervention. The least-square mean changes from baseline to week 8 in PSQI were -8.2 (95% CI, -9.3 to -7.0) points in the taVNS group and -3.9 (95% CI, -5.1 to -2.7) points in the sham group. Both groups experienced statistically significant improvements from before to after the intervention. However, active taVNS showed a clinically meaningful 4.2-point greater reduction (95% CI, -5.9 to -2.6 points; P < .001; Cohen d effect size, 1.2) in PSQI compared with the sham group (minimal clinically important difference = 2.5 points). Secondary outcomes, including mental health and fatigue, showed similar favorable results. The efficacy of taVNS was sustained throughout the 20-week study period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, taVNS significantly reduced insomnia severity. Clinically meaningful enhancements in PSQI scores were observed compared with sham stimulation, with the benefits of taVNS sustained over a 20-week period. Future multicenter clinical trials with large sample sizes are needed to validate its effectiveness across diverse populations. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100051319.

Indexed as

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleep QualityTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39680406
PMCPMC11650411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.