Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680396›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2025

Quality Improvement Intervention for Reducing Acute Treatment Times in Ischemic Stroke: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Daniël Hansen, Sanne J den Hartog, Nikki van Leeuwen, Jelis Boiten, Wouter Dinkelaar, Pieter J van Doormaal, Frank Eijkenaar, Bart J Emmer, Adriaan C G M van Es, H Zwenneke Flach and 30 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Daniël HansenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sanne J den HartogDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Nikki van LeeuwenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jelis BoitenDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, the Hague, the Netherlands.
Wouter DinkelaarDepartment of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Pieter J van DoormaalDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank EijkenaarErasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bart J EmmerDepartment of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Adriaan C G M van EsDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
H Zwenneke FlachDepartment of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Rob GonsDepartment of Neurology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
M Heleen den HertogDepartment of Neurology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Farshad ImaniDepartment of Radiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Paula M JanssenDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hans KortmanDepartment of Radiology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Nyika D KruytDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Laurien S KuhrijDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Christiaan van der LeijDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
T H Rob LoDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Geert Lycklama À NijeholtDepartment of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, the Hague, the Netherlands.
Jasper M M MartensDepartment of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Paul J NederkoornDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jurgen PietDepartment of Neurology, Haga Hospital, the Hague, the Netherlands.
Michel J M RemmersDepartment of Neurology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Suzanne M SilvisDepartment of Neurology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Lotte J StolzeDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wouter StompDepartment of Radiology, Haga Hospital, the Hague, the Netherlands.
Julia H van TuijlDepartment of Neurology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Martine T B TruijmanDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sarah E VermeerDepartment of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Marianne A A van WalderveenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ido R van den WijngaardDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, the Hague, the Netherlands.
H Bart Van der WorpDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Brain Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lonneke YoDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bob RoozenbeekDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
PERFEQTOS Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Efficient care processes are crucial to minimize treatment delays and improve outcome after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with ischemic stroke. A potential means to improve care processes is performance feedback. Objective: To evaluate the effect of performance feedback to hospitals on treatment times for EVT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. Participants were consecutive adult patients with ischemic stroke who underwent EVT in 13 Dutch hospitals. No patients were excluded. Data analysis took place from March to May 2023. Intervention: The intervention consisted of feedback on hospital performance using structure, process, and outcome indicators. Indicator scores were based on data from a national quality registry and compared with a benchmark. Performance feedback was provided through a dashboard for local quality improvement teams who developed and implemented improvement plans based on the feedback. Every 6 months, 3 to 4 randomly selected hospitals switched to the intervention condition. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was time from door to groin puncture for all patients treated with EVT. Secondary outcomes included door-to-needle time, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at day 2, expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months. The effect of the intervention was estimated with multivariable linear mixed models. Results: A total of 4747 patients were included (intervention: 2431; control: 2316). Their mean (SD) age was 72 (13) years; 2337 (49.2%) were female and 2410 (50.8%) were male. The median (IQR) baseline NIHSS score was 14 (8-19). Median (IQR) door-to-groin puncture time under the intervention condition was 47 (25-71) minutes, compared with 52 (29-75) minutes under the control condition. The adjusted absolute reduction was 5 minutes (β = -4.8; 95% CI, -9.5 to -0.1; P = .04), corresponding to a relative reduction of 9.2% (95% CI, -18.3% to -0.2%). Conclusion and Relevance: This study found that performance feedback provided through a dashboard used by local quality improvement teams reduced door-to-groin puncture time for EVT. Implementation of performance feedback in hospitals providing EVT can improve the quality of care for ischemic stroke. Trial Registration: The Netherlands Trial Register: NL9090.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeQuality ImprovementThrombectomyTime-to-TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID39680396
PMCPMC11811792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.