Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680376›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2025

Experience of Older Adults and Their Family Members in the Kidney Transplant Evaluation.

Catherine R Butler, Olivia A Gaughran, Janelle S Taylor, Patrick O Gee, Ann M O'Hare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine R ButlerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Olivia A GaughranDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Janelle S TaylorDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patrick O GeeiAdvocate, Inc, North Chesterfield, Virginia.
Ann M O'HareDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Strengthening Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Kidney Failure Considering Kidney TransplantK23DK129777 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Catherine R Butler · 2022 to 2026
$930k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK129777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Transplant can be a valuable treatment option for older adults with kidney failure, and recent initiatives encourage more frequent referral to transplant centers. However, the evaluation process can be challenging, and most older adults do not ultimately receive a kidney. Objective: To elucidate the perspectives and experiences of older adults with advanced kidney disease and their family members regarding the kidney transplant evaluation process. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study, conducted between December 19, 2022, and February 5, 2024, included adults aged 65 years or older with advanced kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2, receiving dialysis, or with a functioning kidney transplant) and their family members in Seattle, Washington. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perspectives and experiences of patients and family members, identified through inductive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 26 older adults (16 [61.5%] men; median age, 68 years [range, 65-74 years]) with advanced kidney disease and 7 of their family members (4 [57.1%] women; median age, 65 years [range, 36-75 years]) were interviewed. Three dominant themes pertaining to the kidney transplant evaluation process were identified: (1) committed to transplant, (2) a complex and protracted process, and (3) responsibility without power. Because receiving a kidney was such an important priority, most participants were willing to engage in what could be a demanding process of testing and treatment narrowly focused on this future goal. However, the transplant evaluation could be lengthy, demanding, opaque, and fragmented, and patients often put other aspects of their lives on hold while awaiting an uncertain result. Patients and families often felt personally responsible for navigating and completing the transplant evaluation despite having little power to shape this process. Feeling responsible for the continued progress of a high-stakes evaluation process while remaining dependent on clinical teams and family members for support could strain relationships. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study found that older adults with advanced kidney disease and their family members were highly motivated to receive a kidney transplant but engagement in an evaluation process, over which they had little control, could have far-reaching implications for patients and families. These findings underline the importance of making the transplant evaluation process more transparent and person centered and of helping patients and families who are contemplating or engaged in the process to understand what to expect.

Indexed as

FamilyKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39680376
PMCPMC11791702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.