Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680347›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2025

Sex difference in outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: follow-up data of the Netherlands Heart Registration.

Mara-Louise Wester, Jules R Olsthoorn, Mohamed A Soliman-Hamad, Saskia Houterman, Maaike M Roefs, Joost F J Ter Woorst, Cardiothoracic Surgery Registration Committee of the Netherlands Heart Registration

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing cardiovascular care-key insights from the Netherlands Heart Journal 2025.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  2. Three studies, three steps forward in cardiovascular care.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mara-Louise WesterDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. maralouisewester@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9052-5352
Jules R OlsthoornDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Mohamed A Soliman-HamadDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Saskia HoutermanDepartment of Education and Research, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Maaike M RoefsNetherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joost F J Ter WoorstDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Cardiothoracic Surgery Registration Committee of the Netherlands Heart Registration

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesControversies exist regarding sex differences in outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study assessed sex differences in early and mid-term outcomes after CABG and factors associated with these differences. Outcomes were based on data from the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR).

methodsData of patients undergoing CABG in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2019 were retrieved from the NHR database. Primary outcomes were early mortality, morbidity and mid-term survival. The population was divided into subgroups based on age (≥ 70 years and < 70 years). Regression analyses investigated the correlation between sex and both early and mid-term mortality.

resultsThis study included 41,705 male and 10,048 female patients. Median follow-up was 3.6 (1.8-4.8) years. Female patients were less likely to receive ≥ 2 arterial grafts (15.9% vs 23.2%, p < 0.001), had fewer anastomoses (3.2 ± 1.1 vs 3.5 ± 1.1, p < 0.001), higher 30-day mortality (1.9% vs 1.0%; p < 0.001) and a lower mid-term survival rate (91.3% vs 93.1%, p < 0.001). Perioperative complications, including myocardial infarction and stroke, were more common in female patients (all p < 0.001). Women aged < 70 years had a lower mid-term survival rate than men < 70 years (94.5% vs 96.0%, p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that female sex was not significantly associated with mid-term mortality in the total cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03; p = 0.45] but was associated with mid-term mortality in patients aged < 70 years (HR 1.19; p < 0.001).

conclusionsWomen undergoing CABG in our cohort presented with more complex risk profiles, received different surgical strategies and had worse early and mid-term outcomes compared to men. Female sex was associated with mid-term mortality only in patients < 70 years of age.

Indexed as

Coronary artery bypass graftingMale–female differencesNationwide registry

Identifiers

PMID39680347
PMCPMC11695514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.