Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680320›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2025

Graft inflow modulation in recipients with portal hypertension.

Gianluca Cassese, Roberto Montalti, Mariano Cesare Giglio, Gianluca Rompianesi, Roberto Ivan Troisi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gianluca CasseseDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9185-2054
Roberto MontaltiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Mariano Cesare GiglioDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Gianluca RompianesiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberto Ivan TroisiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. roberto.troisi@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching, potentially leading to the "small-for-size syndrome" (SFSS). SFSS is a rare dysfunction that may affect a partial liver graft, characterized by coagulopathy, cholestasis, ascites, and encephalopathy. A key role in the physiopathology of SFSS is played by portal hypertension (PHT) to which a small allograft is submitted after reperfusion, resulting in sinusoidal congestion and hemorrhage. Portal overflow injures the liver directly through nutrient excess, endothelial activation, and sinusoidal shear stress, and indirectly through arterial vasoconstriction. Thus, SFSS prevention relies not only on increasing graft volume (implementing the use of larger grafts or auxiliary/dual liver transplantation), but also on the control of the increased portal vein pressure (PVP) and portal vein flow (PVF). To this aim, surgical graft inflow modulation techniques (GIM) such as splenic artery ligation (SAL), splenectomy and hemiportocaval shunts, can be considered when an imbalance between the PVP and the hepatic arterial flow (HAF) is acknowledged. However, such strategies have their pros and cons, and a deep knowledge of the indications and complications is needed. Furthermore, pharmacological modulation has also been proposed. This review is aimed to update available literature on the current knowledge and strategies for modulating portal vein flow in LDLT.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PortalLiverLiver TransplantationHumansLigationLiver CirculationLiving DonorsPortal PressurePortal VeinSplenectomySplenic ArteryGraft inflow modulationLiving donor liver transplantationPortal hypertensionSmall-for-size syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.