Observational studyImmunologic research2024
Selective IgM deficiency: evaluation of 75 patients according to different diagnostic criteria.
Observational study in Immunologic research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low IgM Levels in Adult IEI: Classification Challenges and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Pediatric selective IgM deficiency: clinical features and a preliminary risk index for immunoglobulin replacement therapy.Immunologic research · 2025Article
- Targeting Complex Cutaneous Viral Infections in Search of Inborn Errors of Immunity.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective IgM deficiency (SIgMD) has recently been included in the inborn errors of immunity classification. SIgMD has conflicting diagnostic criteria and diverse clinical and immunological findings. We aimed to assess the clinical and laboratory profiles of patients with SIgMD and to compare the data of patients diagnosed using two inclusion criteria. This was a descriptive, retrospective, observational, collaborative study. Patients were included according to the following definitions: Group 1, IgM levels < 0.20 g/L in children and < 0.30 g/L in adults, and Group 2, serum IgM levels below 2SD and, for both, absence of associated immunological diseases or secondary causes. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee, and patients provided consent. In total, 75 patients were included: 37 (16 M:21F; mean age, 52.92) and 38 (13 M:25F; mean age, 53.47) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The most frequent clinical manifestations were allergic rhinitis (G1, 45.9%; G2, 36.8%), asthma (G1, 37.8%; G2, 28.9%), and pulmonary infections (G1, 27.03%; G2, 21.05%). Chromosomopathies (16.22%) and neoplasia (13.51%) were more frequent in G1, whereas URTI (23.68%) and skin infections (23.68%) were more common in G2. There was no difference in sex or mean age at symptom onset between both groups of patients. Regarding the clinical picture, 90.7% of the lesions were benign (68/75). Chromosomopathies may be associated with SIgMD, suggesting the need to quantify serum IgM levels in these cases. Considering the possibility of developing autoimmunity, neoplasia, and common variable immunodeficiency, it is advisable to follow up patients with SIgMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39680289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.