Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680278›Full record

ArticleDiscover nano2024

Optimization of process parameters in 3D-nanomaterials printing for enhanced uniformity, quality, and dimensional precision using physics-guided artificial neural network.

Anita Ghandehari, Jorge A Tavares-Negrete, Jerome Rajendran, Qian Yi, Rahim Esfandyarpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anita GhandehariDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Jorge A Tavares-NegreteHenry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Jerome RajendranDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Qian YiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Rahim EsfandyarpourDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. rahimes@uci.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumatic 3D-nanomaterial printing, a prominent additive manufacturing technique, excels in processing advanced materials like MXene, crucial for applications in nano-energy, flexible electronics, and sensors. A key challenge in this domain is optimizing process parameters-applied pressure, ink concentration, nozzle diameter, and printing velocity-to achieve uniform, high-quality prints with the desired filament diameter. Traditional trial-and-error methods often result in significant material waste and time consumption. To address this, our study introduces a comprehensive pipeline that initially assesses whether the selected process parameters yield uniform, high-quality MXene prints. Subsequently, it employs a Physics-Guided Artificial Neural Network (PGANN) to predict the filament diameter based on these parameters, integrating fundamental physical principles of the printing process with experimental data. Our findings demonstrate that using an XGBoost classifier, we can classify printed filament quality with an accuracy of 90.44%. Furthermore, the PGANN model shows exceptional performance in predicting the filament diameter, achieving a Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) of 0.9488, a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.000092 mm

Indexed as

3D-nanomaterial printingAdditive manufacturingData-drivenMachine learningMXenePhysics-guided artificial neural networkProcess parameters

Identifiers

PMID39680278
PMCPMC11649613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.