ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024
Does new research address persistent questions since the publication of the CDC's 2018 pediatric mTBI guideline.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDue to the potential debilitating sequelae following pediatric mTBI, the CDC published the Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of mTBI Among Children in 2018. However, the guideline identified several key gaps in our clinical knowledge to support several clinical recommendations. The objective of this review is to evaluate if subsequent research has addressed these gaps in clinical practice recommendations.
methodsA literature review was conducted in PubMed using keywords from the CDC guidelines for the years of July 2015-January 2021. Articles were screened by title and abstract so only studies with children < 18 years of age and those focusing on mTBI were included.
resultsA total of 531 articles were identified after screening. Forty-three percent was prospective; 24% were case reports, literature reviews, comments, or protocols; 19% were retrospective, 7% were cross-sectional, 4% were RCTs, and 4% were systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Forty-nine percent focused on diagnosis, 17% on prognosis, and 34% on treatment. The four most published topics were neuropsychological tools (28%), risk factors for intracranial injury and computed tomography (11%), cognitive/physical rest (11%), and return to school (10%).
conclusionSince the release of the 2018 CDC guidelines, the majority of publications addressing pediatric mTBI have been prospective studies evaluating the clinical application of neuropsychological tools in concussion management. While these studies do address several of the clinical gaps noted by the CDC regarding the diagnosis and prognosis of pediatric mTBI, there remains a lack of high-quality studies focused on improving pediatric concussion treatment and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39680204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.