Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680202›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024

Relationship between the pelvic incidence and the modified Oxford Hip score: a computed tomographic analysis.

Joseph F Baker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph F BakerDepartment of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. joseph.f.baker@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8518-8780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is scant data on the relationship between skeletal maturity and pelvic parameters such as the pelvic incidence (PI). The aim of this study was to report on the relationship between PI and the modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS) as a measure of skeletal maturity. We hypothesised a significant correlation would be determined between the mOHS and PI.

methodsCT performed for major trauma or abdominal pathology was assessed. The PI and segmental vertebral body angles, L1-L5, were obtained. The mOHS was used to assess maturity with total scores ranging from 16 to 25 (least-most mature). 193 scans were analysed. The mean age 9.7 years (range 4.0 - 15.7); 62 female (32%).

resultsThere were significant positive correlations between age and all components of the mOHS: FH (r = 0.765; p < 0.001), GT (r = 0.749; p < 0.001), LT (r = 0.704; p < 0.001), TC (r = 0.775; p < 0.001), IL (r = 0.642; p < 0.001) and mOHS (r = 0.811; p < 0.001). Mean PI for the cohort was 40.8 (s.d. 9.1; range 19.3-69.4). There were significant albeit weak correlations with FH (r = 0.213; p = 0.003), GT (r = 0.209; p = 0.004), LT (r = 0.247; p < 0.001), TC (r = 0.263; p = < 0.001), IL (r = 0.221; p = 0.002) and total mOHS (r = 0.255; p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression indicated TC and LT the best predictors of PI. Significant correlations noted between L1 segmental lordosis and all components of the mOHS, strongest with triradiate (r=-0.406; p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn this CT-based study, the mOHS correlated weakly with PI and proximal vertebral body lordosis. Of the mOHS components, triradiate and lesser trochanter cartilage status appeared to be best correlated with PI and may be anatomic variables to focus on in future research.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePelvic BonesPelvisChildhoodModified Oxford Hip ScorePaediatricPelvic incidenceTriradiate cartilage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.