SynthesisJournal of neurology2024
Evidence-based recommendations for the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery: a systematic review of guidelines.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management Guidelines for the Treatment of Pediatric Brain Tumor-Associated Seizure: A Modified Delphi Consensus Report.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the methodological quality of guidelines concerning the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery and to summarize relevant recommendations.
methodsPubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), and other guideline repositories and official organizations were searched from 2004 to 2023 (20 years). The extracted information consisted of the guideline characteristics, relevant recommendations, levels of evidence, and strength of recommendations. Using the Guideline Research and Evaluation Tool II (AGREE II), five reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to assess the inter-reviewer consistency.
resultsOf 27 eligible guidelines, AGREE II scores varied with higher scores in Clarity of Presentation (88.89%), Scope and Purpose (83.33%), and Editorial Independence (72.92%), but lower in Rigor of Development (59.17%), Stakeholder Involvement (46.67%), and Applicability (41.67%). ICC ranged from 0.51 to 0.92. Nine guidelines were recommended, eight with modifications, and ten not recommended. ASMs prophylaxis are recommended for patients with a seizure history, which means secondary prophylaxis, and specific high-risk groups, but not recommended for primary prophylaxis routinely for those without a history of seizure.
conclusionsGuidelines in neurosurgical perioperative prophylactic use of ASMs are of moderate quality with domains for enhancement. Guidelines lack detailed guidance on medication initiation, dosage, and duration, highlighting the need for more high-quality clinical trials comparing newer and classical ASMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39680191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.