Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680168›Full record

Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

Prospective comparison of two different surgical technique in the treatment of deep osteochondral lesions of the talus: mosaicplasty versus all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond.

Mustafa Özyıldıran, Mehmet Armangil, Emre Anıl Özbek, Ramazan Akmeşe

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mustafa ÖzyıldıranDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sandıklı State Hospital, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. mozyildiran@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-9267
Mehmet ArmangilDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0433-0253
Emre Anıl ÖzbekDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-9798
Ramazan AkmeşeDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Çankaya Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0999-1256

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are various surgical techniques applied for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The mosaicplasty technique is one of the most commonly used methods for deep lesions. The all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond is a novel method as an alternative to the mosaicplasty. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological results of these two different surgical techniques in the treatment of deep OLT. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom September 2019 to July 2021, 30 patients with deep osteochondral lesions of the talus were randomly divided into two groups for either mosaicplasty or the all-arthroscopic technique, and they were evaluated prospectively. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated within and between groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiological assessments were performed at 6th and 12th month postoperatively according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.

resultsMosaicplasty was applied to 15 patients, and all-arthroscopic technique was applied to 15 patients. 14 of the patients were female and 16 were male; the mean age was 38.1. Within-group evaluations revealed significant improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores at postoperative 6th and 12th months (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in comparison of clinical scores at any time period. There was no significant difference between the two methods according to the total MOCART scores (p > 0.05). However, the all-arthroscopic technique was more successful in terms of "border integration" and "repair tissue structure" (p < 0.05). Age, body mass index (BMI) and lesion surface area were not correlated with clinical scores.

conclusionsIn terms of clinical and radiological scores, similar results were obtained in the treatment groups. Both surgical techniques were found to be effective in the treatment of deep OLT.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyBone TransplantationTalusAdultAutograftsCartilage, ArticularFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTibiaTissue ScaffoldsTransplantation, AutologousYoung AdultAll-arthroscopic techniqueAutologous bone graftMosaicplastyOsteochondral lesionsScaffoldTalus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.