Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39680151›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

Stem subsidence in total hip arthroplasty: retrospective investigation of a short stem using a simple measurement approach.

Nicolas Horst, Christoph Theil, Georg Gosheger, Tobias Kalisch, Burkhard Moellenbeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolas Horst *Department of General Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Christoph Theil *Department of General Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. Christoph.theil@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-4128
Georg GoshegerDepartment of General Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Tobias KalischDepartment of General Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Burkhard MoellenbeckDepartment of General Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment for advanced hip joint diseases. More recently, short stems became increasingly popular, but stem subsidence remains a concern. This study investigates early short stem subsidence in a large patient cohort using a simple measurement approach for everyday practice.

methodsThis retrospective, single center, single implant design study included 1000 patients with primary THA. Subsidence was evaluated using standardized weight-bearing radiographs taken 3-5 days and 2-3 weeks postoperatively with full weight-bearing (FWB). A novel Subsidence Index (SID) was introduced to quantify stem subsidence in a simple and reproducible manner. The SID is calculated by averaging four distinct linear measurements between defined anatomical landmarks on the femur and the implant, captured on standard radiographs without additional software.

resultsOut of all analyzed patients 6% (60/1000) had subsidence of more than 3 mm. The mean subsidence was 1.3 mm (range, 0 to 16.25 mm). There were 0.6% (6) who underwent stem revision for symptomatic subsidence. Men and obese patients had greater subsidence. However, patient age, BMI, stems without lateral bone contact and other demographic factors were not associated with subsidence.

conclusionEarly subsidence is relatively frequent with this uncemented short stem, however revisions are rare. Patients with risk factors should be counseled regarding FWB and radiographic controls should be performed. The SID provides an easy, non-invasive and inexpensive tool for early subsidence assessment; however, its simplicity limits its accuracy. Further research is needed in comparison to more elaborate methods.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRadiographyRetrospective StudiesWeight-BearingCementlessShort stemSubsidence IndexTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39680151
PMCPMC11649837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.